Double-barreled questions are defined as which?

Double-barreled questions are defined as which?

• A. Asks single issue.
• B. Uses jargon.
• C. Contains two questions in one.
• D. Asks about past and future.

Answer: (C)

Double-barreled questions mix more than one issue in a single item, which makes it hard to know what the respondent is actually answering. When a question asks about two things at once, responses can reflect opinions on one part, the other part, or a mix of both, so the data become unclear and harder to interpret reliably. For example, if you ask, "Do you think the curriculum is effective and should be updated?" you’re asking about both the effectiveness of the curriculum and the need for updates in one go. Respondents might agree with one part and not the other, leaving you unsure which aspect their answer targets. That ambiguity is exactly why double-barreled questions are avoided. To fix this, split the items so each question targets a single issue. For instance: "Do you think the curriculum is effective?" and "Do you think the curriculum should be updated?" This way, the responses map clearly to each issue. The other descriptions don’t define double-barreled questions. It’s not about asking a single issue, which would be the opposite. It’s not about using jargon, which affects clarity of language. It’s not about timing (past and future), which is a different kind of question scope.

Double-barreled questions mix more than one issue in a single item, which makes it hard to know what the respondent is actually answering. When a question asks about two things at once, responses can reflect opinions on one part, the other part, or a mix of both, so the data become unclear and harder to interpret reliably.

For example, if you ask, "Do you think the curriculum is effective and should be updated?" you’re asking about both the effectiveness of the curriculum and the need for updates in one go. Respondents might agree with one part and not the other, leaving you unsure which aspect their answer targets. That ambiguity is exactly why double-barreled questions are avoided.

To fix this, split the items so each question targets a single issue. For instance: "Do you think the curriculum is effective?" and "Do you think the curriculum should be updated?" This way, the responses map clearly to each issue.

The other descriptions don’t define double-barreled questions. It’s not about asking a single issue, which would be the opposite. It’s not about using jargon, which affects clarity of language. It’s not about timing (past and future), which is a different kind of question scope.